Euclid Mathematics Contest Preparation: Waterloo Full-Solution Training
- For
- Class 11 - Class 12
- Level
- Intermediate to Advanced
- Duration
- 30 weeks
- Each week
- 4 hours
- Batch
- 1-on-1 or small group of 2-6
- Mode
- Online
- Board
- CEMC, University of Waterloo
A contest where the writing carries the marks
The Euclid Mathematics Contest is run by the Centre for Education in Mathematics and Computing at the University of Waterloo, and it differs from most competitions an international student will have met. Part of the paper asks for full written solutions. The final answer alone is not the submission; the argument is.
For students arriving from AMC-style multiple-choice contests, this is a significant adjustment. They are used to a format where reaching 17 is the entire job. On Euclid, reaching 17 without a justified argument can earn very little, while a well-presented partial attempt that never reaches the answer can earn a good deal.
Why it is worth writing
Beyond the mathematics, Euclid carries practical weight. The University of Waterloo considers contest performance in admission and scholarship decisions for its mathematics and computing programmes, which makes it one of the few competitions with a direct and stated bearing on an admission outcome.
The specific weighting is set by the university and changes between cycles, so we point students to the official Waterloo pages rather than printing a claim here that may not hold next year. What is stable is the general point: for a student considering Waterloo, this contest is not optional enrichment.
The shape of the paper
Euclid builds. The early questions are accessible to any well-prepared senior student, and the later ones are genuinely demanding. Since the later questions are worth the same as the earlier ones but take considerably longer, time allocation becomes a real strategic decision rather than an afterthought.
Students who spread their time evenly across the paper tend to do worse than students who secure the early questions quickly and then commit the remaining time deliberately. We practise this explicitly in the closing weeks, because it is a decision best made before the exam rather than during it.
Writing a solution that earns full marks
Most of what separates a good Euclid score from a mediocre one is not additional mathematics. It is the discipline of writing an argument that a marker can follow and award.
That means stating what is being assumed, justifying the steps that are not self-evident, handling the cases that the problem actually contains rather than the one convenient case, and finishing with a clear conclusion. Students almost never do this naturally, because school examinations rarely require it.
From the first weeks, written work is marked the way the contest marks it. The feedback is usually uncomfortable at first and is the most valuable part of the course.
Syllabus coverage
The contest draws on senior secondary mathematics worked to greater depth rather than on material beyond the school syllabus. Algebraic manipulation underpins everything. Functions, particularly quadratics and their behaviour, appear constantly. Trigonometry, sequences and series, number sense and geometry all feature, with analytic and three-dimensional geometry appearing in the harder later questions.
We work from past papers throughout rather than saving them for the end. The Waterloo style is consistent enough across years that familiarity with it is itself worth marks.
How the classes run
Sessions are live and online, one-on-one or in small groups of two to six. Students write solutions during the session and have them critiqued immediately, which is far more useful than submitting work and receiving a score days later.
The closing weeks are full past papers under timed conditions, marked to contest standard, so the student knows what their written work is actually worth before it counts.
Who this suits
Students in their final two school years who are comfortable with senior algebra, functions and trigonometry. Prior contest experience helps but is not required. What matters is a willingness to be marked strictly on presentation, which is the part most students resist and most need.
Registration is usually arranged through a school and the details vary by country and year. Check cemc.uwaterloo.ca for the current cycle rather than relying on dates reproduced elsewhere.
What students will be able to do
- Write full solutions that earn full marks, since Euclid awards the argument and not merely the final answer
- Handle the Waterloo problem style, which builds from accessible early questions to genuinely demanding later ones
- Work the senior syllabus to contest depth: algebra, functions, trigonometry, sequences, geometry and number sense
- Allocate time across a paper where the later questions are worth the same as the earlier ones but take far longer
- Present working so that partial credit is available even when a solution is not completed
- Understand the weight the contest carries in Waterloo admission and scholarship consideration
Course structure
- Weeks 1-5: Algebraic manipulation to contest standard. Factoring, surds, inequalities, systems, and the algebraic fluency that the whole paper depends on.
- Weeks 6-10: Functions and their graphs. Quadratics in depth, polynomial behaviour, transformations, inverse functions, exponentials and logarithms.
- Weeks 11-15: Trigonometry. Identities, equations, the sine and cosine rules, and the trigonometric problems that appear in the middle of the paper.
- Weeks 16-20: Sequences, series and number sense. Arithmetic and geometric progressions, summation, divisibility and modular reasoning.
- Weeks 21-25: Geometry. Circles, triangles, analytic geometry and the three-dimensional problems that appear in later questions.
- Weeks 26-30: Full past papers under timed conditions, with written solutions marked the way the contest marks them, so a student sees where an argument loses marks before it matters.
Who this is for
Senior secondary algebra, trigonometry and functions. Suited to students in their final two school years.
Students join this programme from India, United States, United Kingdom, United Arab Emirates and Singapore.
Common questions
What makes the Euclid contest different from a multiple-choice competition?
Euclid asks for full written solutions on at least part of the paper, so the marks are in the argument rather than only the answer. A student who can reach the right number but cannot justify it loses marks that a multiple-choice paper would have awarded. This is the single biggest adjustment for students coming from AMC-style contests.
Does the Euclid contest matter for university admission?
It carries real weight for the University of Waterloo, which runs the contest through its Centre for Education in Mathematics and Computing, and results are considered in admission and scholarship processes for its mathematics and computing programmes. Exact weighting is set by the university and changes; confirm at uwaterloo.ca rather than relying on a coaching page.
Who is eligible to write Euclid?
It is aimed at students in their final years of secondary school, and it is written internationally, not only in Canada. Registration is typically arranged through a school. Check cemc.uwaterloo.ca for the current year, since registration windows and arrangements for international candidates vary.
What score should a student aim for?
That depends entirely on the year and the purpose. Rather than quoting a target that may mislead, we work from the published past papers and the official statistics for each year, and set a realistic goal for the individual student after a diagnostic paper.
How much does presentation matter?
More than students expect. Partial credit is available on full-solution questions, so a clearly presented partial argument can earn marks where a correct answer scribbled without justification earns fewer. We mark written work the way the contest does, which usually surprises students in the first few weeks.
Book a trial
Three sessions with the mentor who would teach the full course. Nothing is charged until your slot is confirmed.
- A diagnostic, a taught class and written feedback
- Taught by the mentor who leads the course
- You pick the slot from our live calendar
- Pay only after the slot is confirmed
- For
- Class 11 - Class 12
- Level
- Intermediate to Advanced
- Duration
- 30 weeks
- Each week
- 4 hours
- Batch
- 1-on-1 or small group of 2-6
- Mode
- Online
- Board
- CEMC, University of Waterloo
Ask a question, or book a trial
Tell us about the student and we will reply with an honest view of whether this programme fits. If you would like to see the teaching first, add a trial class.
- No obligation - send the enquiry without booking anything
- Three sessions if you do book: a diagnostic, a taught class and feedback
- Taught by the mentor who would lead the full course
- You choose the slots from our calendar after payment
| Class 1 to 5 | 3 sessions | INR 599 |
| Class 6 to 8 | 3 sessions | INR 799 |
| Class 9 and 10 | 3 sessions | INR 899 |
| Class 11 and 12 | 3 sessions | INR 999 |
| Graduation and above | 4 sessions | INR 1,099 |
Sending an enquiry is free. The fee applies only if you tick the trial box below.